Saturday, March 28, 2009

Meaningless Interaction #2

If someone states an opinion about my words and/or actions, without offering ANY EVIDENCE or proof, then I WILL call them out. I will hunt them down, and I will PROVE one of the following scenarios:

A) The person is merely name calling and doesn't actually have any backing for their statement. In this case, I will demand, but not expect, an apology and/or withdrawal of the statement. I do not actually expect or need one, since anyone in this category is very unlikely to stand up and take responsibility for their meaningless, abusive, and inconsiderate words and actions, and in all likelihood is just plain stupid, which means they have no propensity to remember the random babblings that utter from their uncontrolled lips, thus, making them unaccountable, and safely ignorable.

B) The person actually has found evidence that I am in internal contradiction, which I WANT TO KNOW. I find that VERY VALUABLE. If someone finds a contradiction in me, I'm the type of person that LISTENS, and pays attention to the great information that is being presented to me. I am the type of person that WANTS to be internally consistent and aligned. I find this scenario unlikely, since I really pay attention to myself to begin with, but it is a possibility. AND... even if someone does evoke this potential, so what? It's still no occasion to be superior.

I would like to say that in the case of B this becomes a MEANINGFUL interaction, but it was masked in meaningless interaction if the person ran and wasn't present or respectful enough to provide the necessary backing for their statement, and forced me to extract it painfully from their pea-sized brain, possibly with a knife.

I would also like to say that while scenario A is meaningless, it is extremely fun to hunt down and potentially KILL people in this category.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Proofread BEFORE you submit... no edit, remember.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.